Skip to content

Examination Response Guide

Procedures for responding to regulatory examiner requests during FINRA, SEC, or OCC examinations.


Overview

This guide provides procedures for responding to examiner information requests efficiently and accurately while maintaining appropriate documentation of all interactions.


Response Team Structure

Core Team

Role Responsibility Backup
Response Coordinator Single point of contact with examiners Deputy Compliance Officer
AI Governance Lead Technical responses, agent inventory Senior Platform Admin
Compliance Officer Regulatory interpretation, policy responses Legal Counsel
Power Platform Admin System demonstrations, audit log exports SharePoint Admin
Legal Counsel Review responses, privilege issues Outside Counsel

Extended Team (As Needed)

  • CISO — Security-related inquiries
  • CRO — Model risk and bias inquiries
  • Internal Audit — Control testing evidence
  • Business Owners — Agent-specific questions

Response Process

Step 1: Receive Request

  1. Log all requests in examination tracking system
  2. Assign unique tracking number
  3. Note deadline and priority
  4. Identify responsible team member

Step 2: Assess Request

Assessment Action
Routine request Assign to appropriate owner
Sensitive request Route to Compliance + Legal
Unclear scope Seek clarification from examiner
Potentially privileged Route to Legal immediately

Step 3: Gather Response

  1. Compile requested documentation
  2. Verify accuracy and completeness
  3. Remove any privileged or irrelevant information
  4. Format consistently (PDF preferred for documents)

Step 4: Review Response

  • Technical accuracy verified by subject matter expert
  • Compliance Officer reviewed
  • Legal review (if sensitive)
  • Response Coordinator final review

Step 5: Submit Response

  1. Submit through designated channel
  2. Log submission date and contents
  3. Retain copy of all submitted materials
  4. Note any follow-up commitments

Response Standards

Timeliness

Priority Target Response Time
Urgent Same day
Standard 2-3 business days
Complex 5 business days (negotiate if needed)

Quality Standards

  • Accurate: Verify all facts before submission
  • Complete: Respond to all parts of the request
  • Organized: Use clear headings and labels
  • Traceable: Include document references and dates

Communication Guidelines

DO:

  • Be responsive and cooperative
  • Provide accurate, complete information
  • Ask for clarification if request is unclear
  • Document all interactions
  • Involve Legal when appropriate

DON'T:

  • Speculate or guess
  • Provide information beyond the request scope
  • Make commitments without authority
  • Discuss ongoing examination with others
  • Destroy or alter any documents

Common Request Types

Agent Inventory Requests

Request: "Provide a list of all AI agents deployed in your organization."

Response:

  1. Export agent inventory from Control 3.1 process
  2. Include: Agent name, ID, zone, owner, deployment date, status
  3. Format as Excel or CSV
  4. Include inventory date and methodology

Audit Log Requests

Request: "Provide audit logs for [Agent X] for [Date Range]."

Response:

  1. Access Purview Audit (Control 1.7)
  2. Filter by agent and date range
  3. Export in requested format
  4. Include record count and any limitations

Policy Documentation Requests

Request: "Provide your written supervisory procedures for AI agents."

Response:

  1. Gather Control 2.12 documentation
  2. Include governance framework overview
  3. Include zone-specific procedures
  4. Include approval workflows

Incident History Requests

Request: "Provide documentation of any AI agent incidents in the past 12 months."

Response:

  1. Compile Control 3.4 incident reports
  2. Include resolution documentation
  3. Include root cause analysis
  4. Redact customer PII if present

Escalation Procedures

When to Escalate

Situation Escalate To
Request scope unclear Response Coordinator
Request seems overbroad Legal Counsel
Potential privilege issue Legal Counsel
Cannot meet deadline Compliance Officer
Conflicting requests Response Coordinator
Finding of concern CEO/Board (per policy)

Escalation Path

  1. Level 1: Response Coordinator
  2. Level 2: Compliance Officer + Legal
  3. Level 3: CEO/General Counsel
  4. Level 4: Board (material findings only)

Documentation Requirements

Request Log Template

EXAMINATION REQUEST LOG
Examination ID: [ID]
Request Number: [#]
Date Received: [Date]
Examiner Name: [Name]
Agency: [FINRA/SEC/OCC/Other]

REQUEST DETAILS
Subject: [Brief description]
Full Text: [Copy of request]
Deadline: [Date]
Priority: [Urgent/Standard/Complex]

ASSIGNMENT
Owner: [Name]
Backup: [Name]
Legal Review Required: [Yes/No]

RESPONSE
Response Date: [Date]
Submitted By: [Name]
Documents Provided: [List]
Follow-up Required: [Yes/No]

NOTES
[Any relevant notes or commitments]

Retention Requirements

  • Request logs: 7 years minimum
  • Submitted responses: 7 years minimum
  • Working papers: 7 years minimum
  • Examiner correspondence: 7 years minimum

Post-Examination Activities

Exit Conference

  • Attend scheduled exit conference
  • Document preliminary findings
  • Note any immediate concerns
  • Clarify any misunderstandings
  • Request timeline for written findings

Findings Response

  1. Receive written examination report
  2. Review findings with response team
  3. Prepare management response
  4. Submit response within deadline
  5. Track remediation commitments

Remediation Tracking

  • Log all findings in tracking system
  • Assign remediation owners
  • Set deadlines
  • Monitor progress
  • Report to governance committee
  • Document closure evidence


Last Updated: January 2026 FSI Agent Governance Framework v1.2