Control 3.7: PPAC Security Posture Assessment
Overview
Control ID: 3.7 Control Name: PPAC Security Posture Assessment Regulatory Reference: FINRA 3110, OCC 2011-12, GLBA 501(b), SOX 404 Setup Time: 30-45 minutes
Purpose
The PPAC Security Posture Assessment enables financial institutions to proactively identify, prioritize, and remediate security gaps across their Power Platform tenant. By providing a centralized security score and actionable recommendations, this control ensures FSI organizations maintain a strong security posture aligned with regulatory expectations and industry best practices. Regular security assessments are critical for demonstrating due diligence during regulatory examinations and maintaining customer trust.
Description
The Power Platform Admin Center provides a Security section with security posture assessment capabilities, enabling organizations to identify and remediate security gaps across their Power Platform tenant. This proactive assessment helps FSI organizations maintain compliance and reduce risk.
See Security in Power Platform Admin Center for detailed capabilities.
Key Capabilities
| Capability | Description | FSI Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Security posture assessment | Evaluate tenant security configuration | Baseline risk assessment |
| Recommendations | Actionable security improvement suggestions | Remediation guidance |
| Compliance status | Track security control implementation | Audit readiness |
| Risk prioritization | Identify high-priority security gaps | Resource allocation |
Prerequisites
Primary Owner Admin Role: Power Platform Admin Supporting Roles: None
Licenses Required
| License | Purpose | Required/Optional |
|---|---|---|
| Power Platform Premium | Required for Managed Environments and advanced security features | Required |
| Microsoft 365 E5 | Enhanced security and compliance features | Recommended |
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps | Advanced threat detection for Power Platform | Optional |
Permissions Required
| Role | Purpose | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Power Platform Administrator | Access to PPAC Security section and tenant-wide settings | Tenant |
| Security Administrator | Review and implement security recommendations | Tenant |
| Global Reader | Read-only access to security posture data for reporting | Tenant |
| Compliance Administrator | Access to audit logs and compliance settings | Tenant |
Dependencies
| Dependency | Purpose | Required/Optional |
|---|---|---|
| Control 1.7: Audit Logging | Enable audit trail for security activities | Required |
| Control 2.1: Managed Environments | Enable advanced governance features | Required |
| Control 1.11: Conditional Access | Identity protection recommendations | Recommended |
| Control 1.5: DLP Policies | Data protection recommendations | Recommended |
Pre-Setup Checklist
- [ ] Verify Power Platform Administrator role assignment
- [ ] Confirm Microsoft 365 licensing includes required security features
- [ ] Enable Managed Environments for production environments
- [ ] Enable audit logging in Microsoft Purview
- [ ] Document current security baseline and score
- [ ] Identify security assessment schedule (recommend monthly for FSI)
- [ ] Establish escalation path for critical security findings
Governance Levels
Level 1 - Baseline
| Requirement | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Security access | PPAC Security section accessible |
| Initial assessment | Complete baseline security review |
| Critical items | Address critical recommendations |
Minimum requirements:
- Access PPAC Security section
- Review security score
- Address any critical-rated recommendations
Level 2-3 - Recommended
| Requirement | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Comprehensive review | All recommendations reviewed |
| High-priority remediation | High and critical items addressed |
| Quarterly assessment | Regular security posture reviews |
| Documentation | Security decisions documented |
FSI recommendations:
- Complete all critical and high recommendations
- Document any accepted risks with business justification
- Schedule quarterly security posture reviews
- Track security score improvement over time
Level 4 - Regulated/High-Risk
| Requirement | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Full remediation | All applicable recommendations implemented |
| Continuous monitoring | Monthly security assessments |
| Executive reporting | Security posture in governance reports |
| Third-party validation | Consider independent security assessment |
FSI requirements:
- Maintain security score above organizational threshold
- Monthly review by security team
- Quarterly executive reporting on security posture
- Document all risk acceptance decisions with CISO approval
Security Assessment Process
Step 1: Initial Assessment
- Navigate to PPAC → Security
- Review current security score
- Export recommendations list
- Categorize by priority and effort
Step 2: Gap Analysis
| Gap Type | Analysis Method | Documentation |
|---|---|---|
| Technical | Compare to recommendations | Technical remediation plan |
| Process | Review operational procedures | Process improvement plan |
| People | Assess team capabilities | Training requirements |
Step 3: Remediation Planning
- Prioritize recommendations by risk and effort
- Assign owners for each recommendation
- Set target completion dates
- Track progress in governance meetings
Step 4: Implementation
- Follow Microsoft Learn guidance for each recommendation
- Test changes in non-production first
- Document configuration changes
- Verify implementation effectiveness
Step 5: Continuous Improvement
- Schedule recurring security reviews
- Monitor for new recommendations
- Track security score trends
- Update risk assessments as needed
Integration with Security Controls
| Control | Integration |
|---|---|
| 1.5 DLP Policies | Security recommendations for data protection |
| 1.11 Conditional Access | Identity security recommendations |
| 1.7 Audit Logging | Monitoring recommendations |
| 2.1 Managed Environments | Governance recommendations |
Setup & Configuration
PPAC Security Section
Accessing Security
- Open Power Platform Admin Center
- Navigate to Security in left navigation
- Select Overview to view the security dashboard
Security Navigation Structure
The Security section contains the following subsections:
| Section | Path | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | Security → Overview | Security score and recommendations dashboard |
| Data and privacy | Security → Settings → Data and privacy | Encryption, connector policies, data policies |
| Identity and access | Security → Settings → Identity and access | IP firewall, tenant isolation, sharing, authentication |
| Threat detection | Security → Settings → Threat detection | Microsoft Defender integration for agents |
| Compliance | Security → Settings → Compliance | Auditing, Customer Lockbox |
Security Dashboard Components (Overview)
| Component | Description | Governance Use |
|---|---|---|
| Security score | Percentage score (e.g., "26%") with Low/Medium/High label and points (e.g., "37 of 213 points") | Executive reporting |
| Recommendations table | Prioritized list with Impact, Recommendation, Score increase, Last modified, Category | Remediation planning |
| Active/Dismissed tabs | Filter recommendations by status | Progress tracking |
| Learning resources | Quick links to security documentation | Team training |
Security Score Display
The security score is displayed as:
- Percentage (e.g., 26%)
- Label (Low/Medium/High)
- Points (e.g., 37 of 213 points)
- Visual gauge (0-100 scale with color indicators)
Recommendations Table Columns
| Column | Description |
|---|---|
| Impact | Severity indicator (High, Medium, Low) |
| Recommendation | Description of the security improvement |
| Score increase | Potential score improvement (e.g., "12%") |
| Last modified | Date recommendation was last updated |
| Category | Security area (e.g., "Identity and access") |
Security Settings Categories
| Category | Path | Key Settings |
|---|---|---|
| Data and privacy | Security → Settings → Data and privacy | Customer-managed encryption key, Advanced connector policies (Preview), Data policy, Azure Virtual Network policies |
| Identity and access | Security → Settings → Identity and access | IP firewall, Tenant isolation, IP address-based cookie binding, Environment security groups, Manage sharing, App access control, Guest access, Administrator privileges, Authentication for agents, Channel access for published agents, Global Secure Access for Agents |
| Threat detection | Security → Settings → Threat detection | Additional threat detection for Copilot Studio agents, Microsoft Defender - Copilot Studio AI Agents |
| Compliance | Security → Settings → Compliance | Auditing, Customer Lockbox |
Security Recommendations
High Priority Recommendations
| Recommendation | Risk Level | FSI Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Enable MFA for all users | Critical | Prevents unauthorized access |
| Configure DLP policies | High | Protects customer data |
| Enable managed environments | High | Governance controls |
| Configure conditional access | High | Risk-based access |
| Enable audit logging | Medium | Compliance evidence |
Implementing Recommendations
- Review each recommendation in the Security section
- Click on recommendation for implementation guidance
- Follow the Microsoft Learn documentation
- Mark as implemented when complete
- Verify implementation with testing
PowerShell Configuration
Get Tenant Security Settings
# Prerequisites: Install Power Platform Admin modules
# Install-Module -Name Microsoft.PowerApps.Administration.PowerShell -Scope CurrentUser
# Connect to Power Platform
Add-PowerAppsAccount
# Get all environments for security assessment
$environments = Get-AdminPowerAppEnvironment
foreach ($env in $environments) {
Write-Host "\n=== Environment: $($env.DisplayName) ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
Write-Host "Environment ID: $($env.EnvironmentName)"
Write-Host "Type: $($env.EnvironmentType)"
Write-Host "Security Group: $($env.SecurityGroupId)"
Write-Host "Is Managed: $($env.Properties.isManaged)"
}
Export Security Recommendations
# Export environment security configuration for assessment
$SecurityReport = @()
$environments = Get-AdminPowerAppEnvironment
foreach ($env in $environments) {
# Get DLP policies applied to environment
$dlpPolicies = Get-AdminDlpPolicy | Where-Object {
$_.Environments.name -contains $env.EnvironmentName -or
$_.EnvironmentType -eq "AllEnvironments"
}
# Get security role assignments
$securityRoles = Get-AdminPowerAppEnvironmentRoleAssignment -EnvironmentName $env.EnvironmentName
$SecurityReport += [PSCustomObject]@{
EnvironmentName = $env.DisplayName
EnvironmentType = $env.EnvironmentType
IsManaged = $env.Properties.isManaged
SecurityGroupConfigured = ($null -ne $env.SecurityGroupId)
DLPPolicyCount = $dlpPolicies.Count
AdminRoleCount = ($securityRoles | Where-Object {$_.RoleType -eq "SystemAdministrator"}).Count
MakerRoleCount = ($securityRoles | Where-Object {$_.RoleType -eq "EnvironmentMaker"}).Count
AssessmentDate = Get-Date -Format "yyyy-MM-dd"
}
}
# Export to CSV for compliance documentation
$SecurityReport | Export-Csv -Path "PowerPlatform_SecurityAssessment_$(Get-Date -Format 'yyyyMMdd').csv" -NoTypeInformation
Write-Host "Security assessment exported to CSV" -ForegroundColor Green
Check Security Configuration Status
# Function to check security configuration compliance
function Get-SecurityPostureScore {
param (
[string]$EnvironmentName
)
$env = Get-AdminPowerAppEnvironment -EnvironmentName $EnvironmentName
$score = 0
$maxScore = 100
$findings = @()
# Check 1: Managed Environment enabled (25 points)
if ($env.Properties.isManaged -eq $true) {
$score += 25
$findings += "[PASS] Managed Environment enabled"
} else {
$findings += "[FAIL] Managed Environment NOT enabled - Critical for FSI"
}
# Check 2: Security Group configured (25 points)
if ($null -ne $env.SecurityGroupId) {
$score += 25
$findings += "[PASS] Security Group configured"
} else {
$findings += "[FAIL] No Security Group - Environment accessible to all licensed users"
}
# Check 3: DLP policies applied (25 points)
$dlpPolicies = Get-AdminDlpPolicy | Where-Object {
$_.Environments.name -contains $EnvironmentName -or
$_.EnvironmentType -eq "AllEnvironments"
}
if ($dlpPolicies.Count -gt 0) {
$score += 25
$findings += "[PASS] $($dlpPolicies.Count) DLP policy(ies) applied"
} else {
$findings += "[FAIL] No DLP policies applied - Data protection risk"
}
# Check 4: Limited admin access (25 points)
$admins = Get-AdminPowerAppEnvironmentRoleAssignment -EnvironmentName $EnvironmentName |
Where-Object {$_.RoleType -eq "SystemAdministrator"}
if ($admins.Count -le 5) {
$score += 25
$findings += "[PASS] Admin access appropriately limited ($($admins.Count) admins)"
} else {
$findings += "[WARN] High number of admins ($($admins.Count)) - Review access"
$score += 10 # Partial credit
}
return [PSCustomObject]@{
Environment = $env.DisplayName
Score = "$score / $maxScore"
Percentage = [math]::Round(($score / $maxScore) * 100, 0)
Findings = $findings
}
}
# Run assessment for all production environments
$environments = Get-AdminPowerAppEnvironment | Where-Object {$_.EnvironmentType -eq "Production"}
foreach ($env in $environments) {
$result = Get-SecurityPostureScore -EnvironmentName $env.EnvironmentName
Write-Host "\n=== $($result.Environment) - Score: $($result.Percentage)% ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
$result.Findings | ForEach-Object { Write-Host $_ }
}
Automation for Security Assessment
# Scheduled security assessment automation (run monthly)
# Save as scheduled task or Azure Automation runbook
$ReportPath = "C:\SecurityReports"
$Date = Get-Date -Format "yyyy-MM-dd"
$ReportFile = "$ReportPath\PPAC_SecurityAssessment_$Date.html"
# Ensure report directory exists
if (!(Test-Path $ReportPath)) {
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Path $ReportPath -Force
}
# Generate HTML report
$html = @"
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Power Platform Security Assessment - $Date</title>
<style>
body { font-family: Segoe UI, Arial; margin: 20px; }
h1 { color: #0078d4; }
table { border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; margin: 20px 0; }
th, td { border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 12px; text-align: left; }
th { background-color: #0078d4; color: white; }
.pass { color: green; font-weight: bold; }
.fail { color: red; font-weight: bold; }
.warn { color: orange; font-weight: bold; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Power Platform Security Posture Assessment</h1>
<p><strong>Assessment Date:</strong> $Date</p>
<p><strong>Generated by:</strong> Automated Security Assessment</p>
"@
$environments = Get-AdminPowerAppEnvironment
$html += "<h2>Environment Summary</h2>"
$html += "<table><tr><th>Environment</th><th>Type</th><th>Managed</th><th>Security Group</th><th>DLP Policies</th></tr>"
foreach ($env in $environments) {
$dlpCount = (Get-AdminDlpPolicy | Where-Object {
$_.Environments.name -contains $env.EnvironmentName -or
$_.EnvironmentType -eq "AllEnvironments"
}).Count
$managedClass = if ($env.Properties.isManaged) { "pass" } else { "fail" }
$sgClass = if ($env.SecurityGroupId) { "pass" } else { "fail" }
$dlpClass = if ($dlpCount -gt 0) { "pass" } else { "fail" }
$html += "<tr>"
$html += "<td>$($env.DisplayName)</td>"
$html += "<td>$($env.EnvironmentType)</td>"
$html += "<td class='$managedClass'>$($env.Properties.isManaged)</td>"
$html += "<td class='$sgClass'>$(if($env.SecurityGroupId){'Configured'}else{'Not Set'})</td>"
$html += "<td class='$dlpClass'>$dlpCount</td>"
$html += "</tr>"
}
$html += "</table></body></html>"
$html | Out-File -FilePath $ReportFile -Encoding UTF8
Write-Host "Security assessment report generated: $ReportFile" -ForegroundColor Green
# Optional: Send report via email
# Send-MailMessage -To "security-team@contoso.com" -Subject "Monthly PPAC Security Assessment" -Body "See attached report" -Attachments $ReportFile -SmtpServer "smtp.contoso.com"
Financial Sector Considerations
Regulatory Mapping
| Regulation | Requirement | How This Control Helps | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| FINRA 3110 | Supervisory system security | Identifies security gaps in supervisory tools; tracks remediation | Security assessment reports, remediation logs |
| OCC 2011-12 | Operational risk management | Proactive security posture monitoring reduces operational risk | Monthly assessment scores, trend analysis |
| GLBA 501(b) | Administrative safeguards | Ensures appropriate security controls protect customer information | Security recommendations status, implementation evidence |
| SOX 404 | IT general controls | Security posture assessment supports ITGC compliance | Control testing documentation, exception reports |
| SEC Regulation S-P | Safeguard customer records | Security gaps identified before they become incidents | Assessment history, remediation timelines |
| NIST CSF | Identify, Protect, Detect | Aligns with NIST functions for comprehensive security program | Mapped recommendations to NIST controls |
Tier-Specific Security Posture Requirements
| Tier | Minimum Security Score | Assessment Frequency | Escalation Threshold | Remediation SLA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 (Personal) | 60% | Quarterly | Score drops below 50% | 30 days for High, 90 days for Medium |
| Tier 2 (Team) | 75% | Monthly | Score drops below 65% | 14 days for High, 45 days for Medium |
| Tier 3 (Enterprise) | 85% | Weekly | Score drops below 80% | 7 days for Critical, 14 days for High |
FSI Example YAML
# FSI Security Posture Assessment Configuration
# Save as: security-posture-config.yaml
organization:
name: "Contoso Financial Services"
industry: "Financial Services - Broker-Dealer"
regulatory_framework:
- FINRA
- SEC
- GLBA
- SOX
security_posture:
global_settings:
minimum_score_target: 80
assessment_frequency: "monthly"
report_retention_days: 2555 # 7 years for FSI
auto_remediation: false # Require approval for changes
escalation_matrix:
critical_findings:
notify:
- ciso@contoso.com
- security-team@contoso.com
sla_hours: 48
require_acknowledgment: true
high_findings:
notify:
- security-team@contoso.com
- platform-admins@contoso.com
sla_hours: 168 # 7 days
require_acknowledgment: true
medium_findings:
notify:
- platform-admins@contoso.com
sla_hours: 720 # 30 days
require_acknowledgment: false
zone_configurations:
zone_1_personal:
minimum_score: 60
assessment_frequency: "quarterly"
required_controls:
- basic_dlp_policy
- audit_logging
recommended_controls:
- managed_environments
zone_2_team:
minimum_score: 75
assessment_frequency: "monthly"
required_controls:
- managed_environments
- dlp_policy
- security_groups
- audit_logging
recommended_controls:
- conditional_access
- threat_detection
zone_3_enterprise:
minimum_score: 85
assessment_frequency: "weekly"
required_controls:
- managed_environments
- strict_dlp_policy
- security_groups
- conditional_access
- audit_logging
- threat_detection
- customer_lockbox
recommended_controls:
- ip_firewall
- tenant_isolation
zone_4_regulated:
minimum_score: 95
assessment_frequency: "continuous"
required_controls:
- managed_environments
- strict_dlp_policy
- security_groups
- conditional_access
- phishing_resistant_mfa
- audit_logging
- threat_detection
- customer_lockbox
- ip_firewall
- tenant_isolation
- cmk_encryption
mandatory_reviews:
- governance_committee
- legal
- compliance
reporting:
executive_dashboard:
frequency: "monthly"
recipients:
- cio@contoso.com
- ciso@contoso.com
- cro@contoso.com
metrics:
- overall_security_score
- score_trend_30_day
- critical_findings_count
- remediation_completion_rate
regulatory_evidence:
retention_years: 7
include_in_exam_package: true
formats:
- pdf
- csv
- json
Zone-Specific Configuration
Zone 1 (Personal Productivity):
- Apply a baseline minimum of PPAC Security Posture Assessment controls that impacts tenant-wide safety (where applicable), and document any exceptions for personal agents.
- Avoid expanding scope beyond the user’s own data unless explicitly justified.
- Rationale: reduces risk from personal use while keeping friction low; legal/compliance can tighten later.
Zone 2 (Team Collaboration):
- Apply the control for shared agents and shared data sources; require an identified owner and an approval trail.
- Validate configuration in a pilot environment before broader rollout; retain evidence (screenshots/exports/logs).
- Rationale: shared agents increase blast radius; controls must be consistently applied and provable.
Zone 3 (Enterprise Managed):
- Require the strictest configuration for PPAC Security Posture Assessment controls and enforce it via policy where possible (not manual-only).
- Treat changes as controlled (change ticket + documented testing); retain evidence (screenshots/exports/logs).
- Rationale: enterprise agents handle the most sensitive content and are the highest audit/regulatory risk.
Verification & Testing
| Step | Action | Expected Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Navigate to PPAC → Security | Security dashboard displayed |
| 2 | Review security score | Current score visible |
| 3 | Review recommendations | Prioritized list available |
| 4 | Click on recommendation | Implementation guidance shown |
| 5 | Verify completed items | Status shows implemented |
Reporting
Executive Security Report
Include in quarterly governance reports:
| Metric | Description | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Security score | Overall tenant security | >80% |
| Critical items | Unresolved critical recommendations | 0 |
| High items | Unresolved high recommendations | <5 |
| Trend | Score improvement over time | Positive |
Compliance Evidence
For regulatory examinations, document:
- Current security score
- Implemented recommendations
- Accepted risk decisions with justification
- Remediation timeline for open items
Troubleshooting & Validation
Common Issues and Solutions
| Issue | Cause | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Security score not updating | Assessment runs on schedule, not real-time | Wait 24-48 hours after implementing recommendations; manually refresh the Security dashboard |
| Recommendations not appearing | Insufficient permissions or feature not enabled | Verify Power Platform Administrator role; ensure Managed Environments are enabled |
| Cannot access Security section | Missing admin role or license | Confirm Microsoft 365 E3/E5 license and Power Platform Administrator role assignment |
| Score lower than expected | New recommendations added or configuration drift | Review new recommendations; check for recent environment changes that may have affected score |
| PowerShell commands failing | Module not installed or connection expired | Run Install-Module -Name Microsoft.PowerApps.Administration.PowerShell -Force; reconnect with Add-PowerAppsAccount |
Diagnostic Steps
- Verify Admin Access:
- Navigate to Entra Admin Center > Users > Select your account
- Confirm Power Platform Administrator or Global Administrator role
-
Check license assignments include required SKUs
-
Check Managed Environment Status:
- In PPAC, navigate to Manage > Environments
- Verify production environments show "Managed" status
-
Enable Managed Environments if not already active
-
Validate Audit Logging:
- Navigate to Microsoft Purview > Audit
- Confirm auditing is enabled for the organization
-
Search for recent Power Platform events to verify logging
-
Review Security Dashboard Permissions:
- Security section requires tenant-level admin permissions
- Environment-level admins may not see all recommendations
-
Global Reader role provides read-only access
-
Check for Service Health Issues:
- Review Microsoft 365 Service Health
- Check Power Platform status for any ongoing incidents
- Delays in score updates may indicate service processing
Additional Resources
| Topic | Link |
|---|---|
| Security in Power Platform Admin Center | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-platform/admin/security/overview |
| Managed Environments Overview | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-platform/admin/managed-environment-overview |
| Power Platform Security Best Practices | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-platform/admin/security/security-overview |
| Data Loss Prevention Policies | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-platform/admin/prevent-data-loss |
| Conditional Access for Power Platform | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-platform/admin/restrict-access-online-trusted-ip-rules |
| Power Platform Admin PowerShell | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-platform/admin/powerapps-powershell |
Related Controls
| Control | Relationship |
|---|---|
| Control 1.5: DLP Policies | Data protection recommendations in security assessment |
| Control 1.7: Audit Logging | Audit logging status affects security score |
| Control 1.11: Conditional Access | Identity and access recommendations |
| Control 1.15: Encryption | Data protection and CMK recommendations |
| Control 2.1: Managed Environments | Required for advanced security features |
| Control 3.1: Admin Analytics | Security metrics in admin reporting |
| Control 3.4: Environment Monitoring | Complements security posture with operational health |
Support & Questions
For implementation support or questions about this control, contact:
- AI Governance Lead (governance direction)
- Information Security Officer (security requirements)
- Power Platform Admin (technical setup)
Updated: Dec 2025
Version: v1.0 Beta (Dec 2025)
UI Verification Status: ❌ Needs verification