Regulatory Mappings
Complete mapping of framework controls to regulatory requirements.
FINRA Rule 4511 - Books and Records
Overview
Requires firms to maintain records of all agent activities and communications.
Applicable Controls
| Control | Requirement | Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| 1.7 | Comprehensive Audit Logging | 6-year retention + 1 year accessible |
| 1.9 | Data Retention and Deletion | Retention policies per FINRA timeline |
| 2.9 | Agent Performance Monitoring | Track all agent activity |
| 2.12 | Supervision and Oversight | Compliance Officer oversight |
| 3.1 | Agent Inventory | Central registry of all agents |
| 3.3 | Compliance and Regulatory Reporting | Regular compliance reports |
| 3.4 | Incident Reporting | Document all incidents |
Governance Framework Alignment
Zone 2 Requirements:
- Maintain 1-year audit logs
- Document approval process
- Monthly compliance reviews
- Supervisory controls per Rule 3110
Zone 3 Requirements:
- Maintain 6-year + 1 year accessible audit logs
- Comprehensive real-time monitoring
- Immediate incident escalation
- Weekly executive reporting
Framework Coverage
The framework provides mapped coverage via the applicable controls listed above. Implementation and validation are required for compliance.
FINRA Rule 3110 - Supervision
Overview
Requires written policies and procedures for supervision of agents and AI technologies.
Applicable Controls
| Control | Requirement | Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| 2.12 | Supervision and Oversight | Define supervisory procedures |
| 2.3 | Change Management | Change control and approval |
| 2.5 | Testing and Validation | QA before production |
| 2.6 | Model Risk Management | SR 11-7 alignment |
| 2.11 | Bias Testing | Fairness assessment |
| 3.3 | Compliance Reporting | Supervision documentation |
Key Requirements
- Written Procedures
- Documented approval workflow
- Agent classification procedures
- Escalation procedures
-
Incident response procedures
-
Supervisory Controls
- Compliance Officer oversight for Zone 2+
- Real-time monitoring for Zone 3
- Quarterly compliance reviews
-
Annual testing of controls
-
Qualified Supervisor
- Compliance Officer oversight mandatory
- AI Governance Lead coordination
- Escalation to COO/Board if needed
Governance Framework Alignment
Zone 1: No supervision required
Zone 2:
- Basic supervisory procedures
- Quarterly compliance reviews
- Annual testing
Zone 3:
- Comprehensive supervision
- Real-time monitoring
- Mandatory incident escalation
- Monthly compliance certification
Framework Coverage
Framework provides supervision procedure guidance (6/48 controls). Implementation required.
FINRA Regulatory Notice 25-07 - AI Governance
Overview
Discusses model risk management considerations for AI and algorithmic systems. Topics include validation, monitoring, bias, and governance.
Applicable Controls
| Control | Topic | Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| 2.6 | Model Risk Management | Formal framework per SR 11-7 |
| 2.11 | Bias Testing | Quarterly fairness assessment |
| 1.8 | Runtime Protection | Ongoing monitoring and alerting |
| 1.6 | DSPM for AI | Data handling governance |
| 2.12 | Supervision | Governance procedures |
| 3.2 | Usage Analytics | Performance monitoring |
Key Topics
- Model Validation
- Independent testing required
- Performance baseline established
- Bias testing documented
-
Results retained for audit
-
Ongoing Monitoring
- Performance vs. baseline tracked
- Anomalies detected and investigated
- Monthly monitoring reports
-
Executive escalation procedures
-
Model Governance
- Governance committee oversight
- Change control procedures
- Incident response procedures
- Annual validation recommended
Governance Framework Alignment
The framework treats agents as models requiring comprehensive governance per SR 11-7 principles.
Framework Coverage
Framework addresses Notice 25-07 topics (6/48 controls). Implementation and validation required.
SEC Rule 17a-3/4 - Recordkeeping
Overview
Requires SEC-registered firms to maintain records of all transactions and communications for 6 years + 3 years accessible.
Applicable Controls
| Control | Requirement | Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| 1.7 | Comprehensive Audit Logging | 6-year + 3-year accessible retention |
| 1.9 | Data Retention | Retention policies enforced |
| 2.13 | Documentation and Record Keeping | All records documented |
| 3.1 | Agent Inventory | Registry of agents as records |
| 3.3 | Compliance Reporting | Evidence retention |
Record Categories
Agent Communications:
- All user interactions with agents
- All agent outputs and decisions
- All approvals and rejections
- Retention: 6 years + 3 years accessible
Transaction Records:
- If agent processes transactions
- If agent provides investment advice
- If agent executes trades
- Retention: 6 years + 3 years accessible
Governance Records:
- Agent approvals
- Change logs
- Incident reports
- Model validation results
- Retention: 6 years minimum
Governance Framework Alignment
Zone 2:
- 1-year retention minimum
- Audit logs searchable
- Weekly export recommended
Zone 3:
- 6-year + 3-year accessible
- Immutable storage mandatory
- Real-time audit trail
- Weekly compliance verification
Framework Coverage
The framework provides mapped coverage via the applicable controls listed above. Some requirements may require additional organization-specific controls and procedures. Implementation required.
SEC Rule 10b-5 / Reg BI - Fair Dealing and Disclosure
Overview
Requires fair dealing in transactions and investment advice, including disclosure of conflicts and algorithmic use.
Applicable Controls
| Control | Requirement | Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| 2.6 | Model Risk Management | Agent accuracy and reliability |
| 2.11 | Bias Testing | Fair treatment across demographics |
| 1.14 | Data Minimization | Use only necessary data |
| 1.6 | DSPM for AI | Data governance and privacy |
Key Requirements
- Algorithmic Disclosure
- Inform customers if using AI agent
- Explain agent decision factors
- Disclose material conflicts
-
Provide override/escalation procedure
-
Fair Dealing
- Agent must treat all customers fairly
- No discrimination (ECOA compliance)
- Bias testing documented
-
Model monitoring for fair outcomes
-
Best Execution
- Agent must seek best outcomes
- Performance monitoring required
- Escalation to human advisor available
- Regular review of effectiveness
Governance Framework Alignment
Zone 3 Customer-Facing Agents:
- Mandatory bias testing (quarterly)
- Fair treatment confirmed
- Escalation procedures documented
- Customer disclosure completed
Framework Coverage
Framework incorporates SEC AI disclosure guidance (4/48 controls). Legal review recommended. Implementation required.
SOX Section 302/404 - Internal Controls
Overview
Requires CEO/CFO certification of internal control effectiveness and management assessment.
Applicable Controls
| Control | Requirement | Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5 | Testing and Validation | Control testing documented |
| 2.12 | Supervision | Control procedures documented |
| 2.13 | Documentation | Evidence for control effectiveness |
| 2.10 | Patch Management | Security control maintenance |
| 3.3 | Compliance Reporting | Control effectiveness reports |
| 2.8 | Access Control | Segregation of duties enforced |
Management Assessment Requirements
- Control Design
- Controls documented and approved
- Risk areas identified
- Control procedures defined
-
Responsibility assigned
-
Control Testing
- Annual testing of all controls
- Test results documented
- Deficiencies identified and remediated
-
Testing evidence retained
-
Compliance Reporting
- Management certifies control effectiveness
- Auditor validation of testing
- Any deficiencies disclosed
- Remediation plans documented
Governance Framework Alignment
Zone 2 Agents:
- Annual control testing
- Results documented
- Basic compliance reporting
Zone 3 Agents:
- Annual control testing + quarterly assessments
- Comprehensive documentation
- Monthly compliance certification
- Executive sign-off on effectiveness
Framework Coverage
Framework provides 81% control coverage (40/48 controls). SOX-specific testing required. Implementation required.
GLBA Safeguards Rule (501-505)
Overview
Requires financial institutions to maintain appropriate safeguards for customer information.
Applicable Controls
| Control | Requirement | Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11 | Conditional Access and MFA | Strong authentication |
| 1.15 | Encryption | Data protection in transit and at rest |
| 1.5 | DLP and Sensitivity Labels | Data loss prevention |
| 1.16 | Information Rights Management | Document-level protection |
| 1.18 | RBAC | Access control |
| 1.3 | SharePoint Governance | Permission management |
Key Safeguard Areas
- Administrative Safeguards
- Information security program (documented)
- Qualified individual oversight (CISO)
- Training program (annual mandatory)
-
Incident response procedures
-
Technical Safeguards
- Access controls (RBAC, MFA)
- Encryption (in transit and at rest)
- Audit logging (6+ years)
-
Monitoring and detection
-
Physical Safeguards
- Physical access controls
- Device management
- Secure disposal procedures
Governance Framework Alignment
Zone 2 Agents Accessing Customer Data:
- MFA required
- Encryption in transit
- DLP policies
- Annual training
Zone 3 Agents:
- Phishing-resistant MFA
- Encryption in transit and at rest
- Strictest DLP
- Customer-managed keys (recommended)
- Quarterly training + annual assessment
Framework Coverage
Framework provides 93% control coverage (45/48 controls). Implementation validation required.
OCC Bulletin 2011-12 / SR 11-7 - Model Risk Management
Overview
Applies to national banks and federal savings associations. Requires governance framework for models used in business decisions.
Applicable Controls
| Control | Requirement | Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| 2.6 | Model Risk Management | Formal SR 11-7 framework |
| 2.11 | Bias Testing | Fairness and discrimination testing |
| 2.5 | Testing and Validation | Independent validation |
| 3.2 | Performance Monitoring | Ongoing performance tracking |
| 2.12 | Supervision | Governance committee oversight |
Model Risk Framework (SR 11-7)
- Model Development
- Clear model purpose defined
- Appropriate data sources
- Documented assumptions
-
Validation testing completed
-
Model Validation
- Independent validation required
- Testing covers all use cases
- Performance benchmarks established
-
Bias testing (fairness assessment)
-
Model Monitoring
- Performance vs. baseline tracked
- Drift detection and alerting
- Quarterly monitoring reports
-
Annual validation recommended
-
Model Governance
- Clear roles and responsibilities
- Documented approval process
- Change control procedures
- Incident response procedures
Governance Framework Alignment
Agent Classification as Model:
- Agents using ML/statistical algorithms = Model
- Requires SR 11-7 governance framework
- Annual third-party validation recommended
- Quarterly monitoring mandatory
Applicability
OCC Regulated Entities (National Banks, FSAs):
- All Zone 3 agents using ML = Model
- SR 11-7 framework required
- Annual validation mandatory
Non-OCC Entities:
- SR 11-7 represents best practice
- Apply for Zone 3 high-risk agents
- Recommended even if not OCC-regulated
Framework Coverage
Framework provides 58% control coverage (30/48 controls). OCC-specific model validation required for full compliance.
Federal Reserve Guidance - Fair Lending (ECOA)
Overview
Applies to bank holding companies and entities with lending functions. Requires fair lending practices in credit decisions.
Applicable Controls
| Control | Requirement | Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| 2.11 | Bias Testing | ECOA discrimination testing |
| 2.6 | Model Risk Management | Credit model governance |
| 1.14 | Data Minimization | Fair treatment in data usage |
| 2.12 | Supervision | Compliance oversight |
Fair Lending Requirements
- Non-Discrimination
- Agent must not discriminate based on protected class
-
Protected classes: Race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, disability status, receipt of public assistance
-
Disparate Impact Testing
- Regular testing for unintentional discrimination
- Quarterly monitoring for credit agents
-
Results documented and retained
-
Corrective Action
- If bias detected, investigate and remediate
- Document remediation steps
- Retest after changes
- Board notification if material
Governance Framework Alignment
Credit/Lending Agents (Zone 3):
- Mandatory bias testing (quarterly)
- ECOA protected classes tested
- Results documented and retained
- Remediation if issues detected
- Annual third-party validation
Framework Coverage
Framework provides bias testing controls (2/48 controls applicable). ECOA-specific testing and validation required.
CFPB Guidance - Algorithmic Accountability and UDAAP
Overview
Applies to consumer financial service providers. Focuses on algorithmic accountability, bias, consumer protection, and avoidance of unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices (UDAAP).
Applicable Controls
| Control | Requirement | Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| 2.11 | Bias Testing | Algorithmic bias assessment |
| 1.6 | DSPM for AI | Consumer data protection |
| 1.8 | Runtime Protection | Anomaly detection |
| 2.12 | Supervision | Algorithmic governance |
UDAAP Considerations for AI Agents
Consumer-facing AI agents must avoid Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP):
- Unfair Acts or Practices
- Agent outputs must not cause substantial injury to consumers
- Injury must not be reasonably avoidable by consumers
-
Injury must not be outweighed by benefits
-
Deceptive Acts or Practices
- Agent communications must not mislead consumers
- Material information must be disclosed
-
AI-generated content must be accurate
-
Abusive Acts or Practices
- Agent must not take unreasonable advantage of consumer lack of understanding
- Must not exploit consumer inability to protect their interests
- Must not interfere with consumer ability to understand terms
Consumer Protection Focus
- Transparency
- Disclose algorithmic decision-making to consumers
- Explain key factors in decisions
-
Provide escalation to human review
-
Bias and Fairness
- Regular bias testing
- Results documented and retained
- Disparate impact monitoring
-
Corrective action procedures
-
Accountability
- Clear governance and oversight
- Incident response procedures
- Regular audits and testing
- Board reporting on algorithms
Governance Framework Alignment
Consumer-Facing Agents (Zone 3):
- Mandatory bias testing (quarterly)
- Disclosure to consumers about AI use
- Human escalation available
- Regular audit of fairness outcomes
- UDAAP compliance review for all consumer-facing agent outputs
Framework Coverage
Framework addresses consumer protection topics (4/48 controls). CFPB-specific implementation required.
FDIC-Supervised Institutions
Overview
Applies to state non-member banks, state savings associations, and insured depository institutions supervised by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Regulatory Alignment
FDIC-supervised institutions follow the same interagency guidance as OCC and Federal Reserve institutions:
| Guidance | FDIC Applicability | Framework Alignment |
|---|---|---|
| Interagency Model Risk Guidance (SR 11-7) | Adopted by FDIC | Control 2.6, 2.11 |
| Interagency Third-Party Guidance (2023) | Joint OCC/Fed/FDIC | Control 2.7 |
| FFIEC IT Examination Handbook | Primary reference | Pillars 1-4 |
| GLBA Safeguards Rule | Required | Pillar 1 Security |
Applicable Controls
All framework controls apply to FDIC-supervised institutions. Key controls include:
| Control | Requirement | FDIC Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| 1.7 | Audit Logging | FFIEC IT Handbook - Audit and Monitoring |
| 1.11 | Conditional Access/MFA | FFIEC Authentication Guidance |
| 1.15 | Encryption | FFIEC Information Security |
| 2.6 | Model Risk Management | Interagency SR 11-7 guidance |
| 2.7 | Third-Party Risk | Interagency Third-Party Guidance (2023) |
| 2.12 | Supervision | Examination expectations |
FFIEC IT Examination Alignment
The framework aligns with FFIEC IT Examination Handbook domains:
| FFIEC Domain | Framework Pillar | Key Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Information Security | Pillar 1 | 1.5, 1.11, 1.15, 1.18 |
| Audit | Pillar 1, 3 | 1.7, 3.1, 3.3 |
| Business Continuity | Pillar 2 | 2.4 |
| Operations | Pillar 2 | 2.1, 2.3, 2.10 |
| Outsourcing Technology | Pillar 2 | 2.7 |
Governance Framework Alignment
FDIC-Supervised Institutions:
- Apply the same zone-based governance as OCC/Fed institutions
- Follow interagency model risk guidance (SR 11-7) for AI agents
- Reference FFIEC IT Examination Handbook for examination preparation
- Maintain evidence for examination readiness
Framework Coverage
Framework provides equivalent coverage to OCC/Fed institutions. All 48 controls applicable.
NCUA-Supervised Credit Unions
Overview
Applies to federally insured credit unions supervised by the National Credit Union Administration.
Regulatory Alignment
NCUA follows similar principles to banking regulators for technology risk management:
| Regulation | Description | Framework Alignment |
|---|---|---|
| NCUA Part 748 | Security Program Requirements | Pillar 1 Security Controls |
| NCUA Cybersecurity Guidance | Risk assessment and controls | Pillars 1-3 |
| FFIEC IT Examination Handbook | Shared examination standards | All Pillars |
Applicable Controls
| Control | Requirement | NCUA Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | DLP and Sensitivity Labels | Member data protection |
| 1.7 | Audit Logging | Examination documentation |
| 1.11 | Conditional Access/MFA | Authentication controls |
| 1.15 | Encryption | Member information security |
| 2.3 | Change Management | Control environment |
| 2.7 | Third-Party Risk | Vendor oversight |
| 2.12 | Supervision | Board and management oversight |
NCUA Part 748 Alignment
Part 748 requires credit unions to maintain a security program. Framework controls support:
- Administrative Controls (Part 748.1)
- Governance roles (RACI Matrix)
- Training requirements (Control 2.14)
-
Incident response (Control 3.4)
-
Technical Controls (Part 748.1)
- Access controls (Control 1.18)
- Encryption (Control 1.15)
-
Audit trails (Control 1.7)
-
Response Programs (Part 748.1)
- Incident detection and response (Control 3.4)
- Member notification procedures
Governance Framework Alignment
Credit Union Implementation:
- Credit unions may adapt the framework based on asset size and complexity
- Smaller credit unions may combine roles (see RACI Matrix guidance)
- Zone classification remains applicable
- Compliance Officer oversight for Zone 2+ agents
Framework Coverage
Framework controls applicable to credit unions. Adapt based on asset size and AI agent complexity.
State-Level Regulations (For Awareness)
Overview
State-level regulations may apply depending on where the institution is chartered, operates, or serves customers. The following are provided for awareness; institutions should consult legal counsel for applicability.
NYDFS Part 500 (23 NYCRR 500)
Applicability: Entities licensed by NYDFS (banks, insurers, money transmitters) with New York operations.
The framework's controls align with NYDFS Part 500 cybersecurity requirements:
| Part 500 Section | Requirement | Framework Control(s) |
|---|---|---|
| §500.02 | Cybersecurity Program | Pillar 1 (Security), Pillar 2 (Management) |
| §500.03 | Cybersecurity Policy | Governance documentation |
| §500.05 | Penetration Testing | 2.5 Testing and Validation |
| §500.06 | Audit Trail | 1.7 Comprehensive Audit Logging |
| §500.07 | Access Privileges | 1.18 RBAC, 2.8 Segregation of Duties |
| §500.08 | Application Security | 2.5 Testing, 1.8 Runtime Protection |
| §500.10 | Cybersecurity Personnel | RACI Matrix role definitions |
| §500.11 | Third-Party Risk | 2.7 Vendor and Third-Party Risk |
| §500.12 | MFA | 1.11 Conditional Access and MFA |
| §500.14 | Training | 2.14 Training and Awareness |
| §500.15 | Encryption | 1.15 Encryption |
| §500.16 | Incident Response | 3.4 Incident Reporting |
| §500.17 | Notices to Superintendent | 3.4 Incident Reporting (escalation) |
Note: NYDFS Part 500 underwent significant amendments effective November 2023. Institutions should verify current requirements with legal counsel.
CCPA/CPRA (California)
Applicability: Institutions with California customers may be subject to CCPA/CPRA for certain data processing activities.
GLBA Preemption: Financial institutions subject to GLBA may have limited CCPA/CPRA obligations for GLBA-covered data. However:
- Non-GLBA data may still be subject to CCPA/CPRA
- Employee data may be subject to CPRA
- Consult legal counsel for your specific situation
The framework's data governance controls (1.5, 1.6, 1.9, 1.14) support privacy compliance but do not specifically address CCPA/CPRA requirements.
Other State Regulations
Additional state-level requirements may apply:
- State Insurance Regulators - See Insurance Regulators section
- State Banking Regulators - State-chartered institutions should consult their state regulator
- State Privacy Laws - Other states have enacted privacy laws (Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, etc.)
Insurance Regulators (For Awareness)
Overview
Insurance companies are primarily regulated at the state level. The NAIC (National Association of Insurance Commissioners) develops model laws that states may adopt.
NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law
Many states have adopted versions of the NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law, which requires:
| Requirement | Model Law Section | Framework Alignment |
|---|---|---|
| Information Security Program | Section 4 | Pillar 1, Pillar 2 |
| Risk Assessment | Section 4(C) | Zone classification, risk assessment |
| Security Controls | Section 4(D) | Pillar 1 Security Controls |
| Third-Party Oversight | Section 4(F) | Control 2.7 |
| Incident Response | Section 5 | Control 3.4 |
| Investigation and Notification | Section 6 | Control 3.4 |
Framework Applicability to Insurers
The framework controls are generally applicable to insurance companies:
| Framework Area | Insurance Relevance |
|---|---|
| Pillar 1 (Security) | Information security program requirements |
| Pillar 2 (Management) | Governance and oversight requirements |
| Pillar 3 (Reporting) | Incident response and reporting |
| Pillar 4 (SharePoint) | Document and data governance |
Governance Framework Alignment
Insurance Company Implementation:
- Apply zone-based classification to AI agents
- Follow state insurance regulator requirements
- Reference NAIC model laws as baseline
- Consult state insurance department for specific requirements
- Annual certification may be required in some states
Recommendation
Insurers should consult their primary state insurance regulator and legal counsel to confirm specific requirements. The framework provides a solid foundation but may require state-specific adaptations.
Control Coverage Summary by Regulation
| Regulation | Applicable Controls | Coverage | Implementation Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| FINRA 4511 | 48/48 | 100% | Full coverage - implementation required |
| FINRA 3110 | 6/48 | 14% | Partial - supervision focus |
| FINRA Notice 25-07 | 6/48 | 14% | Partial - model risk focus |
| SEC 17a-3/4 | 43/48 | 88% | Substantial coverage |
| SEC Rule 10b-5 / Reg BI | 4/48 | 9% | Limited - fairness focus |
| SOX 302/404 | 40/48 | 81% | Substantial coverage |
| GLBA 501-505 | 45/48 | 93% | Substantial coverage |
| OCC 2011-12 | 30/48 | 58% | Partial - model risk focus |
| Fed SR 11-7 | 30/48 | 58% | Partial - model risk focus |
| Fed ECOA | 2/48 | 5% | Minimal - bias testing only |
| CFPB / UDAAP | 4/48 | 8% | Consumer protection focus |
| FDIC (Interagency) | 48/48 | 100% | Full applicability; align to interagency guidance |
| NCUA Part 748 | 45/48 | 93% | Security program alignment |
| NYDFS Part 500 | 40/48 | 83% | State-level awareness |
| NAIC Model Law | 35/48 | 73% | Insurance awareness |
Note: Coverage percentages indicate which framework controls address aspects of each regulation. Actual compliance requires implementation, validation, and ongoing maintenance. Consult legal counsel for regulatory interpretation. See Disclaimer.
How to Use This Document
- Find your primary regulation in the list above
- Review applicable controls for your regulation
- Check governance zone alignment (Zone 2 vs Zone 3 requirements)
- Reference individual control files for detailed implementation
- Document compliance evidence for audit purposes
FSI Agent Governance Framework Beta - December 2025