Control 1.16: Copilot Tuning Governance
Control ID: 1.16 Pillar: Readiness & Assessment Regulatory Reference: GLBA 501(b), OCC Bulletin 2011-12 (SR 11-7), Interagency AI Guidance (2023) Last Verified: 2026-04-09 Governance Levels: Baseline / Recommended / Regulated
Objective
Assess and govern the use of Microsoft 365 Copilot Tuning, which enables organizations with 5,000+ Copilot licenses to create fine-tuned AI agents from proprietary organizational data. This control establishes the governance framework for evaluating tuning readiness, controlling access to tuning capabilities, managing data handling risks, and maintaining audit trails over tuned agent lifecycles.
Why This Matters for FSI
Copilot Tuning introduces a new category of AI model customization risk that financial institutions must evaluate within their existing risk management frameworks:
- Model customization on sensitive data: Tuning on confidential trading data, customer PII, or internal policy documents creates model customization risk. Tuned agents may reflect patterns from sensitive training data in their outputs, requiring output supervision controls to prevent inadvertent disclosure.
- Data residency and processing: SharePoint snapshots used for tuning are tenant-isolated and the EU Data Boundary is respected. However, global tenants may see processing in other regions depending on tenant configuration. Organizations should verify that tuning data processing aligns with their data residency requirements.
- OCC SR 11-7 model risk management: The OCC's guidance on model risk management (SR 11-7 / OCC Bulletin 2011-12) establishes expectations for model validation, ongoing monitoring, and governance. Tuned Copilot agents function as customized AI models and should be assessed under these principles, including documentation of the tuning basis, intended use, and limitations.
- Audit trail requirements: Tuning jobs, data source selections, agent creation events, and output supervision decisions should be logged to support regulatory examination readiness and internal audit review.
- Third-party AI governance: The Interagency AI Guidance (2023) calls for institutions to maintain appropriate governance for AI systems, including those customized from vendor-provided platforms. Tuning extends Microsoft's base models with institutional data, creating a shared responsibility model for AI governance.
Disclaimer
This control is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, regulatory, or compliance advice. See full disclaimer.
Control Description
Admin Controls for Copilot Tuning
Copilot Tuning is managed through the M365 Admin Center with the following administrative controls:
| Control | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|
| Tenant-level enablement | Enable or disable Copilot Tuning for the entire tenant | Disabled |
| User/group scoping | Restrict tuning access to specific users or Entra ID groups | N/A (requires enablement) |
| Request access flow | End users request tuning access with a business justification; admin approval is required before tuning can proceed | Approval required |
| Open-source model controls | Admins can restrict whether external open-source base models are available for tuning | Configurable |
Data Handling
- SharePoint snapshots: Copilot Tuning uses point-in-time snapshots of SharePoint content as the tuning data source. These snapshots are tenant-isolated and retained while the tuned agent is active.
- Snapshot lifecycle: When a tuned agent is deleted, associated SharePoint snapshots are deleted.
- Privacy controls: Microsoft staff cannot access tuning data or snapshots without Customer Lockbox authorization.
- Data scope awareness: Organizations should carefully evaluate which SharePoint sites and libraries are included in tuning scope to prevent inadvertent inclusion of regulated or restricted content.
Request and Approval Workflow
The tuning request flow requires:
- End user submits a tuning request with business justification
- Request is routed to the designated admin or approval group
- Admin reviews the business justification, data sources, and intended use
- Admin approves or denies the request with documented rationale
- Approved tuning jobs are logged for audit trail purposes
Copilot Surface Coverage
| Surface | Tuning Relevance | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat | Primary | Tuned agents are accessed through Copilot Chat |
| SharePoint | Data source | SharePoint content serves as the tuning data source |
| Teams | Potential interaction surface | Tuned agents may be accessible through Teams Copilot |
| Other M365 apps | Indirect | Tuned agent outputs may be referenced in other Copilot surfaces |
Governance Levels
Baseline
- Copilot Tuning is disabled by default at the tenant level
- Document the organization's policy decision on Copilot Tuning (enabled, disabled, or under evaluation)
- If tuning is enabled, document which users or groups have access and the business justification
- Review Microsoft's Copilot Tuning data handling documentation and assess alignment with the institution's data governance requirements
Recommended
- Enable Copilot Tuning for approved groups only via Entra ID group-based scoping
- Require documented business justification for all tuning requests
- Establish a quarterly review of active tuned agents, including data sources, intended use, and output quality
- Restrict tuning data sources to non-PII SharePoint sites unless explicitly approved by compliance
- Review open-source model controls and configure based on organizational risk tolerance
- Integrate tuning governance into the existing AI governance committee agenda
Regulated
- Enable Copilot Tuning only with documented CISO and/or CRO approval
- Restrict tuning data sources to approved, non-PII SharePoint sites with documented data classification review
- Implement output supervision for tuned agents, including periodic review of agent responses for accuracy and compliance
- Maintain a tuning audit log capturing: requestor, approver, data sources, tuning job dates, agent lifecycle events, and any output supervision findings
- Assess tuned agents under OCC SR 11-7 model risk management principles, including documentation of model basis, intended use, limitations, and validation approach
- Include tuning governance in regulatory examination evidence packages
- Conduct annual review of tuning policy, access controls, and active agents with compliance and risk management input
Setup & Configuration
Step 1: Review Tenant Tuning Settings
- Navigate to M365 Admin Center > Settings > Microsoft 365 Copilot
- Locate the Copilot Tuning section
- Verify that tuning is disabled by default (Baseline requirement)
- Document the current configuration state
Step 2: Define Tuning Access Policy
- Determine which user populations, if any, are approved for tuning access
- Create Entra ID groups for approved tuning users (e.g.,
Copilot-Tuning-Approved) - Configure tuning access to the approved group only
- Document the approval criteria and business justification requirements
Step 3: Configure Data Source Restrictions
- Identify SharePoint sites and libraries that contain regulated, restricted, or PII content
- Document which SharePoint content is approved for use as tuning data
- Communicate data source restrictions to approved tuning users
- Establish a review process for tuning data source selections
Step 4: Establish Monitoring and Review
- Define the review cadence for active tuned agents (quarterly recommended)
- Assign responsibility for tuning governance oversight
- Configure audit log retention for tuning-related events
- Integrate tuning metrics into existing Copilot governance reporting (see Control 4.5)
Financial Sector Considerations
- Model risk management: Tuned Copilot agents represent a form of model customization. Institutions subject to OCC SR 11-7 should evaluate whether tuned agents meet the definition of a "model" under their model risk management framework and apply proportionate validation and monitoring controls. Organizations should verify their assessment approach with their model risk management team.
- Data classification review: Before enabling tuning on any SharePoint content, conduct a data classification review to identify regulated data (customer PII, trading data, material non-public information) that should be excluded from tuning scope.
- Output supervision: Tuned agents may produce outputs that reflect patterns from the training data. For agents tuned on financial data or internal policy, periodic output review helps identify accuracy issues or inadvertent disclosure of sensitive information.
- Vendor risk management: Copilot Tuning extends the institution's use of Microsoft's AI platform. The tuning capability should be assessed under the institution's third-party risk management framework, including review of Microsoft's data handling commitments and Customer Lockbox protections.
- Examination readiness: Maintain documentation of tuning decisions, data sources, approval workflows, and governance reviews in the institution's regulatory examination file. Examiners may ask how the institution governs AI model customization.
Verification Criteria
| # | Verification Step | Expected Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Review Copilot Tuning tenant settings | Tuning is disabled or restricted to approved groups per policy |
| 2 | Verify tuning access group membership | Only approved users are in the tuning-enabled Entra ID group |
| 3 | Review tuning request and approval workflow | Documented approval process exists with business justification requirements |
| 4 | Confirm data source restrictions are documented | Approved and restricted SharePoint sites for tuning are identified |
| 5 | Review active tuned agents inventory | List of active tuned agents with data sources and owners is current |
| 6 | Verify audit trail for tuning events | Tuning requests, approvals, and agent lifecycle events are logged |
| 7 | Confirm output supervision process (Regulated) | Periodic output review evidence exists for active tuned agents |
| 8 | Review open-source model control settings | External base model usage is configured per organizational policy |
Additional Resources
- Microsoft Learn: Copilot Tuning admin guide
- OCC Bulletin 2011-12: Sound Practices for Model Risk Management (SR 11-7)
- Interagency Guidance on AI (2023)
- GLBA Safeguards Rule
- Related Controls: 1.1 Copilot Readiness Assessment, 1.8 Information Architecture Review, 2.1 DLP Policies for Copilot, 3.1 Copilot Audit Logging, 4.5 Usage Analytics
FSI Copilot Governance Framework v1.3.1 - April 2026