Control 3.9: AI Disclosure, Transparency, and SEC Marketing Rule — Troubleshooting
Common issues and resolution steps for AI disclosure and transparency controls.
Common Issues
Issue 1: Sensitivity Label Content Markings Not Appearing
- Symptoms: The AI-Assisted Content label is applied but header/footer markings are not visible in the document.
- Root Cause: Content marking settings may not be enabled in the label policy, or the application does not support content markings.
- Resolution:
- Verify the label configuration includes content marking:
Get-Label -Identity "AI-Assisted-Content" | Select *Marking* - Confirm the label policy is published and distributed: check
DistributionStatus. - Ensure the user is running a supported version of Office that renders content markings.
- Test in Word desktop (full support) before testing in web or mobile apps.
Issue 2: DLP Policy Not Detecting Copilot-Assisted Content
- Symptoms: External emails drafted with Copilot assistance are sent without AI disclosure and are not blocked by DLP.
- Root Cause: The DLP rule conditions may not correctly identify Copilot-assisted content, or the sensitivity label is not being automatically applied.
- Resolution:
- Verify the DLP policy is enabled and distributed.
- Check that the DLP rule conditions correctly reference the AI-Assisted Content label or Copilot metadata.
- Consider implementing auto-labeling to apply the AI-Assisted Content label to Copilot-generated content automatically.
- As an interim measure, rely on user training and communication compliance review for detection.
Issue 3: Users Bypassing AI Disclosure Requirements
- Symptoms: Users override DLP policy tips and send undisclosed AI-assisted content externally.
- Root Cause: DLP policy is set to "Block with override" allowing users to bypass, or users are not trained on disclosure requirements.
- Resolution:
- Review override justifications in the DLP incident reports.
- If overrides are excessive, change the policy action from "Block with override" to "Block" for high-risk groups.
- Conduct targeted training for teams with high override rates.
- Add override usage to supervisory reporting for compliance review.
Issue 4: SEC Marketing Rule Classification Inaccurate
- Symptoms: Non-marketing content is being flagged as requiring SEC Marketing Rule review, or actual marketing content is missed.
- Root Cause: Detection conditions may be too broad or too narrow, or user groups are not correctly scoped.
- Resolution:
- Review the policy scope to ensure only marketing and client-facing teams are targeted.
- Refine keyword lists to distinguish marketing language from general business communication.
- Add exclusion conditions for internal communications and non-client content.
- Consider using trainable classifiers specifically trained on the firm's marketing content.
Diagnostic Steps
- Check label deployment:
Get-LabelPolicy | Select Name, Enabled, DistributionStatus - Review DLP incidents:
Get-DlpDetectionsReport -StartDate (Get-Date).AddDays(-7) -EndDate (Get-Date) - Verify content markings: Open a labeled document and check for header/footer visibility.
- Test DLP enforcement: Send a test email to an external address without disclosure language.
Escalation
| Severity | Condition | Escalation Path |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Undisclosed AI content reaching clients at scale | Chief Compliance Officer + Marketing compliance |
| High | DLP enforcement failing to block non-compliant content | IT security + Compliance team |
| Medium | High override rate on DLP policies | Compliance team — training and policy review |
| Low | Minor label formatting issues | IT support for Office configuration |