Skip to content

Intake questions — Full path

Path: Full
Target: Tier 1 / Zone 1 requests
Approver topology: Sponsor + 5-reviewer parallel
Target completion time: 2-4 weeks

Path summary

The Full path is the enterprise and high-risk route for agents with customer-facing exposure, MNPI or NPI handling, cross-border movement, autonomous action, financial authority, or other characteristics that require the broadest reviewer pack. It preserves the same intake evidence foundation as Express and Standard, then adds the questions needed for enterprise-scale supervision, privacy, legal, model-risk, resilience, and records review.

The default reviewer pack is Sponsor plus five parallel reviewer roles: InfoSec, Privacy, Compliance, Legal, and MRM. The default quorum is three of five plus Sponsor, but Tier-1 requests keep MRM as a non-waivable reviewer under firm policy, and Records, Procurement, or IT Operations can become mandatory when the questions below trigger them. All wording and defaults assume commercial Microsoft 365 and en-US maker-facing text. The catalog supports evidence collection for OCC Bulletin 2026-13 firm-level governance, SR 11-7-style tiering where the firm applies it, FINRA Rule 3110 supervision, FINRA Rule 4511 and SEC Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 recordkeeping, CFTC Rule 1.31 retention, GLBA 501(b) safeguards, and optional NY DFS 23 NYCRR 500 §500.11 review; it does not certify compliance.

For v1.0.0-preview, the shared baseline answers continue to map to first-class fsi_intakerequest columns, while every Standard-only and Full-only answer below is stored in fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.<jsonKey>. The <jsonKey> convention uses a stable lower-camel-case form of the proposed v1.1 field name (for example, f1ExternalExposure), and any future first-class fsi_s* or fsi_f* columns should mirror that preview JSON payload rather than replace it.

Section A — Maker identity & sponsor (auto-prefilled from Graph)

Field (Dataverse logical name) Source Use in decision pack
fsi_makerdisplayname Microsoft Graph /me.displayName Human-readable maker identity on sponsor and reviewer views
fsi_makerupn Microsoft Graph /me.userPrincipalName Primary accountability key across all intake artifacts
fsi_makerdepartment Microsoft Graph /me.department Reviewer routing and business-unit context
fsi_makerjobtitle Microsoft Graph /me.jobTitle Reviewer context for scope and role fit
fsi_makercountry Microsoft Graph /me.usageLocation or profile country ADR-005 cross-border default-deny comparison input
fsi_sponsorupn Microsoft Graph /me/manager.userPrincipalName; maker can correct if the manager lookup is blank or wrong Sponsor routing and approval evidence
fsi_requestid GUID generated on form load or pre-submit flow Correlation key across request, approval, review, and decision-log rows
fsi_status System default (DraftSubmitted) Workflow lifecycle state
fsi_policyversionapplied Deployment policy version from policy-lookup-tables.yaml Audit traceability for the rule set in force at submission

Section B — Agent scope & business case

# Field (Dataverse logical name) Question shown to maker Type Required Routing impact Control mapping
B1 fsi_agentdisplayname What should the agent be called? Text 5-200 Yes Informational only — carried into the sponsor and reviewer packs, registry handoff, and retained decision pack. 1.2, 2.13, 3.1
B2 fsi_businessoutcome What business outcome should this support? Choice or short text Yes Informational only — used for registry metadata, reviewer context, and post-launch value tracking. 1.2, 2.13, 3.1
B3 fsi_businessjustification In one or two sentences, what will it do? Multiline text 50-500 Yes Informational only — reviewers use this baseline narrative when deciding whether the enterprise control set is proportional and complete. 2.12, 2.13, 3.1
B4 fsi_agenttype What type of agent will you build? Choice (fsi_intake_agenttype) Yes Informational only — helps determine environment fit, routing notes, and downstream handoff detail. 1.2, 2.1, 3.1
B5 fsi_intendedaudience Who will use it? Choice: Just me / My team / My department / Anyone in the firm / External users Yes Gating — Anyone in the firm or External users typically keep the request on Full; narrower audiences can still remain on Full when other high-risk triggers fire. 1.18, 2.1, 3.1

Section C — Risk triggers & residency

# Field (Dataverse logical name) Question shown to maker Type Required Routing impact Control mapping
C1 fsi_t1initiatesfinancialtxn Will it initiate financial transactions or move money? Yes / No / Not sure Yes Gating — Yes or Not sure keeps the request on Full and makes MRM, Compliance, and InfoSec mandatory. 2.5, 2.12, 2.13
C2 fsi_t2customerfacing Will it interact directly with customers or external parties? Yes / No / Not sure Yes Gating — Yes or Not sure keeps the request on Full and makes Compliance mandatory. 1.7, 2.12, 2.13
C3 fsi_t3autonomousunmonitored Can it act without a human reviewing each action? Yes / No / Not sure Yes Gating — Yes or Not sure keeps the request on Full and increases required control and kill-switch evidence. 2.12, 2.13, 2.24
C4 fsi_t4handlesnpi Will it process customer nonpublic personal information (NPI)? Yes / No / Not sure Yes Gating — Yes or Not sure keeps the request on Full and makes Privacy mandatory. 1.5, 1.14, 2.13
C5 fsi_t5handlesmnpi Will it process material nonpublic information (MNPI) or information-barrier data? Yes / No / Not sure Yes Gating — Yes or Not sure keeps the request on Full and makes Compliance and Legal mandatory. 1.22, 2.12, 2.13
C6 fsi_t6crossborderdata Will data cross country or regional residency boundaries? Yes / No / Not sure Yes Gating — Yes or Not sure keeps the request on Full and applies ADR-005 default-deny handling until Privacy approves an override. 1.14, 2.12, 2.13
C7 fsi_dataresidencycountry Where is the data expected to reside? Country/region text or choice Yes if C6 is not No Gating when C6 is not No — if the maker country and declared residency differ, the router applies ADR-005 default-deny pending Privacy override. 1.14, 2.1, 2.13

Section D — Team scope, integrations, and data handling

Storage model: for v1.0.0-preview, the shared Standard additions below are stored in fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson using the stable keys s1AudienceExtension through s10MonitoringPlan. If v1.1 adds first-class fsi_s* columns, treat them as mirrors of the preview JSON blob rather than a rename of the preview contract.

# Canonical storage reference Question shown to maker Type Required Routing impact Control mapping
D1 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.s1AudienceExtension Which teams or named Microsoft 365 groups will receive this agent, and about how many users do you expect in the first 90 days? Composite: group picker + integer band Yes Gating — unresolved group scope, external guests, or very broad distribution keep the request on Full and may add Legal or Records review. 1.2, 1.18, 2.1, 3.1
D2 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.s2ConnectorInventory Which Power Platform connectors, Graph scopes, or external endpoints will the agent use? Multiselect + free text Yes Gating — premium/custom connectors or write/send-external endpoints keep InfoSec mandatory; any financial-action endpoint confirms Tier-1 handling. 1.4, 1.5, 1.14, 2.13
D3 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.s3DataSources List the SharePoint sites, Dataverse tables, mailboxes, or other data sources the agent will read from. Multirow text or linked records Yes Gating — missing source names blocks approval; regulated, privileged, or out-of-tenant sources keep Privacy, Compliance, or Legal mandatory. 1.14, 2.13, 2.16, 4.8
D4 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.s4OutputDestinations Where can the agent send or post outputs? Multiselect: Teams / email / SharePoint / Dataverse / CRM / other Yes Gating — customer-directed, public-channel, or broad email distribution keeps Compliance and Records mandatory. 1.7, 1.18, 2.12, 2.13
D5 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.s5OutputClassification What sensitivity label and retention class should reviewers assume for typical outputs? Composite: sensitivity choice + retention choice Yes Gating — Confidential or Restricted output, custom retention, or likely WORM scope keeps Privacy or Records mandatory. 1.5, 1.7, 2.13, 4.3
D6 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.s6MakerTrainingAck Have you completed the firm's AI maker training for team-scope agents? Choice: Completed / In progress / Not yet taken Yes Gating — In progress or Not yet taken pauses the request until training is complete or waived by policy. 2.14, 3.1
D7 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.s7DeploymentPattern Will this agent be promoted across dev/test/prod environments, and will it use Power Fx, custom actions, or custom skills? Composite: environment choice + Yes/No + short text Yes Gating — production promotion requires Managed Environment and change-management checks; custom logic keeps InfoSec mandatory. 2.1, 2.3, 2.15, 2.24
D8 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.s8AgentRouting Will this agent call other agents or allow other agents to call it? Yes / No + linked agent IDs if Yes Yes Gating — Yes keeps InfoSec mandatory and may add architecture review under multi-agent orchestration limits. 1.18, 2.17, 2.13
D9 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.s9SponsorBackupUpn Who is the backup business sponsor or successor approver if the primary sponsor is unavailable? UPN picker Yes Gating — blank, external, or maker-matches-sponsor values block submission until a valid successor is named. 2.12, 2.13, 3.1
D10 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.s10MonitoringPlan What monthly invocation volume do you expect, and how will you sample or monitor outputs after go-live? Composite: volume band + sampling/monitoring plan Yes Gating — high volume, no monitoring plan, or no sampling rate keeps InfoSec and Compliance mandatory. 1.7, 2.9, 3.2, 3.10

Storage model: for v1.0.0-preview, the Full-only answers below are stored in fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson using the stable keys f1ExternalExposure through f13RegulatorNotificationPlan. If v1.1 adds first-class fsi_f* columns, treat them as mirrors of the preview JSON blob rather than a rename of the preview contract.

# Canonical storage reference Question shown to maker Type Required Routing impact Control mapping
E1 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f1ExternalExposure Will any customer, prospect, counterparty, regulator, or other external party directly receive the agent's output, and is any part of that output a recordable business communication? Composite: exposure choice + Yes/No Yes Gating — Yes makes Compliance and Records mandatory and keeps the request on Full. 1.7, 2.12, 2.13, 2.19
E2 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f2MnpiBarrierData Will the agent access MNPI, research under information barriers, or other restricted dealing data? Choice: Yes / No / Not sure Yes Gating — Yes or Not sure makes Compliance and Legal mandatory; unsupported information-barrier use cases may be denied. 1.22, 2.12, 2.13
E3 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f3NpiPrivacyImpact Describe any NPI, sensitive personal data, privileged material, or legal-hold/eDiscovery content the agent will handle, and whether a DPIA or privacy impact assessment is required. Composite: multiline text + choice Yes Gating — NPI, privileged data, or DPIA required makes Privacy mandatory and keeps approval pending until the assessment is complete. 1.5, 1.14, 1.19, 2.13
E4 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f4CrossBorderAssessment Will prompts, outputs, logs, or supporting data cross US borders at any point? If yes, which jurisdictions are involved and what lawful basis or contractual mechanism applies? Yes / No + jurisdiction list + short text Yes Gating — Yes or Not sure applies ADR-005 default-deny until Privacy and Legal approve the transfer basis. 1.14, 2.12, 2.13
E5 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f5AutonomyLevel What autonomy level (0-5) best describes this agent, and which actions require human-in-the-loop approval? Composite: level choice + multiselect Yes Gating — higher autonomy levels or missing HITL coverage keep the request on Full and can block approval until control design is updated. 1.23, 2.12, 2.13, 2.24
E6 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f6FinancialAuthority Can the agent move money, place or change orders, adjust positions or limits, or write to a regulated system of record? Multiselect Yes Gating — any affirmative answer makes MRM, Compliance, and InfoSec mandatory and confirms Tier-1 handling. 2.5, 2.6, 2.8, 2.12, 2.13
E7 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f7ModelRiskPackage What firm model-risk tier applies, and what validation evidence already exists (validation report, benchmark results, drift-test plan, owner)? Composite: tier choice + document references Yes Gating — missing validation evidence keeps MRM approval pending; Tier-1 makes MRM non-waivable under firm policy. 2.5, 2.6, 2.13, 3.1
E8 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f8FairnessExplainability What bias or fairness checks, explainability standards, and inspection rights must be met before go-live? Composite: multiselect + short text Yes Gating — customer-affecting or regulated decisions without test and inspection plans remain on hold. 2.5, 2.11, 2.13
E9 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f9ReviewerAssurancePlan Which reviewer attestations, independent test steps, and champion/challenger or pre-production comparison activities are required before release? Composite: multiselect Yes Gating — independent testing is mandatory for Tier-1; named reviewers become mandatory approvers in the parallel pack. 2.5, 2.6, 2.12, 2.13
E10 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f10ShutdownAndResilience What shutdown criteria, kill-switch owner, and BCM/DR classification apply if the agent must be suspended or recovered quickly? Composite: multiselect + short text Yes Gating — missing kill-switch or recovery ownership blocks approval and may add IT Operations review. 2.4, 2.9, 2.13, 3.4
E11 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f11VendorAndLiability Which third-party model or vendor supports this agent, what liability or insurance class applies, and does NY DFS 23 NYCRR 500 §500.11 review trigger for your firm? Composite: choice + short text Yes Gating — non-Microsoft or third-party vendor use makes Legal and Procurement mandatory; NY DFS trigger adds the optional T7 review path where enabled. 2.7, 2.13, 2.24
E12 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f12ObservabilityIncidentResponse What logging and observability plan, and which incident response playbook reference, apply if the agent misbehaves? Composite: short text + link/reference Yes Gating — missing log destination or playbook reference blocks approval and adds SOC or Compliance follow-up. 1.7, 2.9, 2.13, 3.2, 3.4
E13 fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson.f13RegulatorNotificationPlan If this agent causes a material incident, which regulator-notification or customer-notification thresholds apply? Choice + short text Yes Gating — unclear notification obligations keep Compliance and Legal mandatory before go-live. 1.7, 2.12, 2.13, 3.4

Customer override notes

Customers can split any composite Full-path prompt into multiple UI controls if needed, but they should preserve the canonical storage references and routing semantics above so the reviewer app, classification engine, and flow docs stay aligned. Reviewer quorum, MRM committee naming, NY DFS enablement, label taxonomies, lawful-basis templates, and vendor-risk criteria should be adjusted in configuration rather than by renaming the preview JSON keys.

For v1.0.0-preview, keep the shared Standard additions and Full-only answers in fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson under the documented s1AudienceExtension through s10MonitoringPlan and f1ExternalExposure through f13RegulatorNotificationPlan keys. If v1.1 adds first-class fsi_s* or fsi_f* columns, treat them as mirrored projections of the JSON blob so the preview payload contract stays stable even when customers add finer-grained helper fields.

Acceptance evidence collected

  • All Express and Standard-path evidence plus the enterprise-scale review inputs needed for Full-path approval.
  • The preview stores the shared Standard additions under s1AudienceExtension through s10MonitoringPlan and the Full-only answers under f1ExternalExposure through f13RegulatorNotificationPlan inside fsi_intakerequest.fsi_standardfullquestionsjson; v1.1 can add first-class mirrors without changing the preview payload contract.
  • Parallel reviewer approvals, overrides, rationale, and required-attestation outcomes are captured in fsi_intakereview; sponsor approval remains in fsi_intakeapproval and fsi_intakedecisionlog.
  • Model-risk evidence, privacy assessments, lawful-basis notes, playbook references, and resilience decisions should also flow into the immutable decision pack so auditors can reconstruct the exact approval basis later.