Control 1.1: Copilot Readiness Assessment and Data Hygiene — Verification & Testing
Test cases and evidence collection procedures for validating Copilot readiness and data hygiene controls.
Test Cases
Test 1: Readiness Report Completeness
- Objective: Verify that the Microsoft 365 Copilot readiness report and network connectivity test have been run and all infrastructure findings have been reviewed
- Steps:
- Sign in to Microsoft 365 admin center as Entra Global Admin
- Navigate to Reports > Usage > Microsoft 365 Copilot > Readiness
- Confirm the readiness report shows current results (data is available within 72 hours, with up to 72 hours of latency)
- Verify prerequisite license eligibility and eligible update channel counts have been reviewed, and that network connectivity test results for Copilot endpoints have been captured
- Confirm that any "blocking" findings have been addressed or have documented remediation plans
- Expected Result: No blocking infrastructure issues remain, or all blocking issues have documented remediation timelines
- Evidence: Export of the readiness report with timestamp and network connectivity test output; remediation plan document if findings exist
Test 1b: Readiness Dashboard Accessibility
- Objective: Verify that the Copilot readiness dashboard is accessible and returning data
- Steps:
- Sign in to Microsoft 365 admin center as Entra Global Admin
- Navigate to Reports > Usage > Microsoft 365 Copilot > Readiness
- Confirm the report loads and displays the readiness summary charts and user activity table
- Verify data freshness (readiness data can carry up to 72 hours of latency)
- Expected Result: Report displays current readiness metrics across license eligibility, update channel eligibility, and app usage
- Evidence: Export of the readiness report with timestamp
Test 2: Oversharing Assessment Completeness
- Objective: Verify the oversharing assessment has scanned all relevant SharePoint sites
- Steps:
- Run PowerShell Script 2 (Data Hygiene Scan) to get total site count
- Compare against the DSPM oversharing report site count in Purview
- Verify coverage exceeds 95% of active sites
- Confirm high-sensitivity sites are all included in the scan
- Expected Result: DSPM report covers at least 95% of active SharePoint sites
- Evidence: Export of scan coverage comparison showing site counts
Test 3: Sensitivity Label Coverage Threshold
- Objective: Verify sensitivity label adoption meets the target for the organization's governance tier (>50% Baseline / >75% Recommended / >90% Regulated)
- Steps:
- Open Microsoft Purview > Information Protection > Label Analytics
- Review the overall labeling rate for documents in SharePoint and OneDrive
- Check department-level breakdown for any groups below threshold
- Verify auto-labeling policies are active for common FSI content types
- Expected Result: Organization-wide label coverage meets or exceeds the target for the selected governance tier
- Evidence: Label analytics report export showing coverage percentages
- Objective: Confirm that identified permission anomalies have been remediated
- Steps:
- Reference the initial readiness assessment report findings
- Re-run PowerShell Script 1 against previously flagged sites
- Verify that "Anyone" links have been removed from sensitive sites
- Confirm sharing capabilities are set to appropriate levels
- Expected Result: Zero critical permission anomalies on sites containing regulated data
- Evidence: Before and after comparison of permission scan results
Test 5: Governance Committee Sign-off
- Objective: Verify that the readiness assessment has been formally reviewed and approved
- Steps:
- Locate the readiness assessment report in the governance document repository
- Verify it includes all required sections (oversharing, labels, permissions, recommendations)
- Confirm governance committee has reviewed and signed off
- Verify remediation plan is documented for any outstanding items
- Expected Result: Signed readiness assessment report with documented approval
- Evidence: Signed report copy with committee meeting minutes
Evidence Collection
| Evidence Item |
Format |
Storage Location |
Retention |
| Readiness dashboard screenshot |
PNG/PDF |
Compliance evidence repository |
7 years |
| Oversharing assessment export |
CSV/JSON |
Compliance evidence repository |
7 years |
| Label coverage analytics |
PDF |
Compliance evidence repository |
7 years |
| Permission scan results |
CSV |
Compliance evidence repository |
7 years |
| Governance committee sign-off |
PDF |
Governance document repository |
7 years |
Compliance Mapping
| Regulation |
Requirement |
How This Control Supports It |
| FINRA Rule 3110 |
Supervisory system review |
Readiness assessment documents supervisory review of AI data access |
| SEC Rule 17a-4 |
Records preservation |
If the firm treats readiness assessments as required books and records, preserve them in accordance with Rule 17a-4; otherwise retain per internal record-retention policy |
| 12 CFR part 30, appendix D (OCC Heightened Standards) |
Risk management governance |
Where applicable to covered institutions, formal governance review supports compliance with heightened risk management requirements |
| NIST AI RMF |
MAP 1.1 — Context established |
Readiness assessment maps the AI deployment context |
Next Steps