Control 2.11: Copilot Pages Security and Sharing Controls — Verification & Testing
Test cases and evidence collection for validating Copilot Pages security.
Test Cases
Test 1: Sharing Restriction Enforcement
- Objective: Confirm Pages sharing is restricted to "Specific people" and external sharing is blocked
- Steps:
- Create a Copilot Page through a Copilot interaction
- Attempt to share the Page using "Anyone with the link" — verify it is blocked
- Attempt to share with an external user — verify it is blocked
- Share with an internal specific user — verify it succeeds
- Expected Result: Only "Specific people" internal sharing is permitted
- Evidence: Screenshots of sharing attempts and their outcomes
Test 2: Sensitivity Label Application
- Objective: Verify supported sensitivity labeling behavior on Copilot Pages and confirm Notebook-level labels aren't available
- Steps:
- Create a Copilot Page from a source document with a "Confidential" label and confirm label inheritance is working
- Manually apply a published sensitivity label directly to a Copilot Page and confirm it is accepted
- If mandatory labeling or a default document label policy applies to the Pages location, verify a new Page is labeled accordingly (automatic and recommended labeling aren't supported, so unlabeled content is never auto-labeled)
- Create a Copilot Notebook and confirm no Notebook-level sensitivity label option is available — Notebooks share the user-owned container with Pages and Loop My workspace and don't have container sensitivity labels
- Verify DLP policies are in place as the compensating control for Notebook content
- Expected Result: Pages support manual label application, label inheritance, mandatory labeling, and a default document label, but not automatic or recommended labeling; Notebooks have no sensitivity label option, with DLP documented as the compensating control
- Evidence: Page properties showing applied sensitivity label; confirmation that no label option exists on a Notebook; DLP policy configuration covering Notebook content
Test 3: Retention Policy Coverage
- Objective: Confirm retention policies apply to Copilot Pages
- Steps:
- Verify the retention policy scope includes Copilot Pages storage
- Create a test Page and verify it is subject to retention
- Attempt to delete a Page under retention hold — verify it is preserved
- Expected Result: Retention policies apply to Pages content
- Evidence: Retention policy configuration and preservation test results
Evidence Collection
| Evidence Item |
Format |
Storage Location |
Retention |
| Sharing configuration |
Screenshot |
Compliance evidence repository |
7 years |
| Sharing test results |
PDF |
Compliance evidence repository |
7 years |
| Label application verification |
Screenshot |
Compliance evidence repository |
7 years |
| Retention coverage confirmation |
PDF |
Compliance evidence repository |
7 years |
Compliance Mapping
| Regulation |
Requirement |
How This Control Supports It |
| FINRA Rule 3110 |
Communication supervision |
Pages sharing controls support compliance with AI-generated content oversight |
| SEC Rule 17a-4 |
Records retention |
Retention on Pages helps meet records preservation requirements |
| GLBA §501(b) |
Information sharing controls |
Sharing restrictions help prevent unauthorized distribution of AI-generated content |
| - Back to Control 2.11 |
|
|